IATP Food and Community Fellows
  • About Us
  • Meet the Fellows
  • Blog
  • Workgroups
  • Digest

Fresh Ideas Blog

New Roads to New Markets: Patty Cantrell does TEDx Manhattan
For the Love of Food
Growing food sovereignty in the desert
Healthy Trends in School Cafeterias
Community health through traditional foods
More Fresh Ideas

From the Digest

Racism in Food Policy in New Orleans


By Jenga Mwendo

RSS feed

Syndicate content

Meet the Fellows

Jane Black

Jane Black is a food writer who covers food politics, trends and sustainability issues.

Home ยป Blog

One Nation, Underfed

Posted Wed., January 25, 2012 at 2:20 pm by Raj Patel

Filed under: hunger, policy, SNAP

Originally posted on rajpatel.org

This week on DemocracyNow!, I got to talk a little about Newt Gingrich’s poisonous comments on Obama being the food stamp president. First, the facts. Under George Bush, the number of people on the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (what food stamps are more properly called in the US) rose by 14.7 million. Under Obama, the number rose by 14.2 million. It’s true, however, that much more money is being spent by Obama. As part of the stimulus bill, entitlements rose to a whopping average of $134.

The entitlements help, to some extent, to dampen in the impact of poverty. And in the teeth of the recession, it’s hard to argue against strengthening the safety net when so many Americans were falling into it.

Which brings us to Gingrich’s racial coding of ‘food stamp president’. Larry Wilmore deconstructs this nicely on The Daily Show.

 

While Gingrich’s comments are vile and reprehensible, the abandonment of the poor is wholly bipartisan. The fiasco over last year’s Child Nutrition Reauthorization Act demonstrates this amply. I wrote about this in 2010, arguing that, given the 100+billion dollar annual cost of hunger, a watered down $8 billion-dollar-over-ten-years bill to feed children was a bargain. The total amount that the government authorized: $4.5 billion, paid for by raiding the SNAP entitlement funds. Taking money from adults to feed their children is craven, but as Gingrich’s comments, and the rhetoric of deserving and undeserving poor suggests, our politicians are becoming increasingly Victorian.

Beneath this, the conversation that isn’t happening is, of course, about why poverty flourishes, and how to end it. As the documentary ‘Finding North’ – slug line: One Nation, Underfed – points out, that many hundreds of thousands more people want to be on assistance but can’t qualify. One in four children are food insecure in the US, and – I was shocked to learn – half of children in the US will be on assistance at some point in their lives. Hence the documentary’s title. The beautiful title track, written by The Civil Wars tells of a country that has lost its compass, and is having trouble finding north.

  • Add new comment
  • share
  • Printer-friendly version
Institute for Agriculture and Trade Policy